Life is a blessing

Welcome to my blog. Hope you can enjoy it.







Life is a blessing, live with hope and happiness every day.







Thursday, October 13, 2011

The Advantages of Rubrics



Summary
By Licda. Belinda Davis

A rubric is a scoring guide that seeks to evaluate a students' performance based on a full range of criteria. It is an assessment used to measure students' work. It is a working guide for students and teachers. Rubrics can be created for any content.

Why use rubrics?
When students receive rubrics before, they understand how they will be evaluated and can prepare accordingly. Developing a grid and making it available as a tool for students' use will provide a better quality and increase their knowledge.

Create an Original Rubric
To get started remember:
1. Establish the concepts to be taught (objectives)
2. Choose the criteria to be evaluated.
3. Develop a grid. Plug in the concepts and criteria.
4. Share the rubric with students before.
5. Evaluate the end product.

Analytic vs. Holistic Rubrics

*Analytic rubrics identify and assess components of a finished product.
*Holistic assess students work as a whole.
To choose the best type of rubric remember considering your students and grader; for modeling, present anchor products or exemplars of products at various levels of development.

What is a weighted rubric?
Is an analytic rubric in which certain concepts are
judged more heavily than others.
A weighted rubric clearly communicates to the students
and their parents which parts of the project or assessment
are more important to learn for a particular activity.

Rubrics are important and necessary tools for everyday teaching, don't lose sight of the purpose or objectives of
the assessment by getting down in meaningless details.
Rubrics can be used for oral presentations, projects, written assessments, creative writing and many others.

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Sindicatos de Educadores tienen la razón

Sindicatos de Educadores tienen la razón.


Saludos queridas almas: El Sindicato de Trabajadores de la Educación (SEC) hizo un llamado a huelga a sus afiliados, con esta movida se pone cuesta arriba la directriz del Ministerio de Educación Pública (MEP) de solicitar un comprobante de asistencia a los afiliados que asistan a este evento y  no podrá hacer rebajos ni tomar represalias hasta que un Tribunal declare ilegal el movimiento. Con la reciente jurisprudencia de la Sala Constitucional, será toda una odisea para el MEP lograr su cometido. 

En ocasiones anteriores he criticado duramente a los sindicatos (incluidos los del magisterio), pero en esta ocasión tienen toda la razón: Los 5 días para congresos están por fuera de la jornada laboral de 200 días lectivos, así que es falso que el MEP esté dando licencia con goce de salario a los funcionarios para que asistan a este evento, y por lo tanto cualquier control que quiera ejercer es una intromisión directa en la organización de los sindicatos.


También es cierto que se está explotando a los funcionarios que no están afiliados a ningún sindicato, porque se les obliga a trabajar cinco días más (fuera de los 200) sin ninguna paga extra, este pobre diablo quisiera saber cuántos empleados estarían dispuestos a este atropello.  El Colegio de Licenciados y Profesores debería demostrar que sirve para algo, y llevar un proceso laboral contra el MEP en representación de los docentes no afiliados a los sindicatos, con el fin de cobrar los días extras que los obligan a trabajar.

La jurisprudencia que utiliza el MEP para amedrentar a los sindicatos está bien jalada del pelo: primero porque se refiere a los dirigentes y no a los afiliados; segundo, porque se refiere a permisos sindicales EN HORAS LABORALES, y como se expuso anteriormente, los días de congreso están por fuera de los 200 días lectivos; y tercero, porque no se infiere que dicha jurisprudencia se refiera a relaciones laborales con educadores.

Y lo peor es que el MEP y varios medios de comunicación le han hecho creer a la ciudadanía que esos cinco días de congreso y la organización de los mismos son pagados por el MEP, cuando esa información es más falsa que un político honesto: El costo de la organización de los congresos corre por cuenta de las organizaciones sindicales que obtienen fondos de los aportes de sus afiliados.

Y cuando el MEP dice que esos cinco días son pagados por el Estado manipula la verdad maliciosamente: Todos los trabajadores reciben salario los 365 días del año -porque a nadie le dejan de pagar en vacaciones, fines de semana o feriados- pero si a cualquier trabajador lo hacen ir a bretiar fuera de su jornada laboral ¿qué es lo que corresponde? que le paguen el doble por los días extra trabajados, cosa que el MEP NUNCA HARÁ.

Cualquiera podría maliciar que esta jugarreta del MEP es una represalia contra los sindicatos por rechazar la propuesta de trimestralización. La solución a este conflicto es muy simple y ojalá lo pongan en práctica a partir del año que viene: no deben incluirse los días de congreso en el calendario escolar porque son días que están fuera de la jornada laboral de los 200 días lectivos y cada organización deberá realizar su congreso cuando estime conveniente, siempre y cuando no esté dentro de esos 200 días.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

My Glossary

Because learning is exciting and fun, I hope these words are helpful.

1. Gleaned: to learn, discover, or find out, usually little by little or slowly.

2. Proofread: to read (printers' proofs, copy, etc.) in order to detect and mark errors to be corrected.

3. Hallmarks: any mark or special indication of genuineness, good quality. Any  distinguishing feature or characteristic.

4.  Deemed:  to form or have an opinion; judge; think.

5. Benchmark: any standard or reference by which others can be measured or judged.
 6. Venue: the position taken by a person engaged in argument or debate; ground.
 
7. Genre:  a class or category of artistic endeavor having a particular form, content, or technique. Kind, sort, style.
 
8. Thesaurus:  any dictionary, encyclopedia or other comprehensive reference book.   a dictionary of synonyms and antonyms.

9. Germane: closely or significantly related; relevant; pertinent.

10. Amenable: capable of or agreeable to being tested, tried, analyzed. Ready or willing to answer.

11. Odds: the ratio of probability that something is so, will occur, or is more likely to occur than something else. A difference favoring one of two contestants.

12. Biases: a particular tendency or inclination, especially one that prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question; prejudice.

13. Allayed:  to put (fear, doubt, suspicion, anger, etc.) to rest; calm; quiet.

Monday, October 3, 2011

Assessing Speaking

Summary
Chapter 6

The aim or objective of learning a new language is to be able to communicate. Speaking is an important channel of communication in a general English program. When testing this skill, we want to simulate real - life situations that students engage  in conversations, ask and answer questions, and give information.
Heaton(1995, p.88) stated that speaking is "an extremely difficult skill to test, as it is far too complex a skill to permit any reliable analysis to be made for the purpose of objective testing."

Why Test Speaking?
In communicative language teaching, speaking is a prominent component of language curriculum. If we value communication skills, we must assess them or we send a double message to our students about what is important. With English now a global language, we need to develop proficiency in speaking. 
                                                          
Theory of Speaking Assessment
Canale and Swain(1980) argue that there are four competencies underlying speaking ability:
1. Grammatical competence: knowledge of grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics.
2. Discourse competence: rules of cohesion and coherence, holding communication together in a meaningful way.
3. Sociolinguistic competence: knowledge of what is expected socially and culturally.
4. Strategic competence: manipulation of the language, how to keep a conversation going or end it, how to resolve communication breakdowns.

Categories of Oral Skills

The routine skills are associated with language functions and the spoken language required in certain situations like ordering food in a restaurant or asking for directions. By contrast, the improvisational skills are more general and may be brought into play at any time for clarification, to keep a conversation flowing, to change topics, or to take turns.

Important Things to Remember

1. It is unrealistic with large classes to test speaking individually because of time and resources.
2. Decide if your focus is more on fluency or accuracy.
3. Check if students mistakes impede comprehension or cause a breakdown in communication.
4. Some criterias you can use on accuracy(grammar), vocabulary, linguistic ability(pronunciation, intonation, and stress), for fluency(ability to express ideas), and content or ideas.
5. Students can be tested individually, in pairs, or in groups of three.
6. Speaking tests can be conducted live or be recorded.


Formal Speaking Assessment Techniques

Canale(1984) proposed a framework for speaking tests. He believed that students do best when they are led through the following stages:
* Warm up: the purpose is to relax students. Students are asked general or personal information.
* Level check: try to determine the students' level of speaking through questions or activities. This part is assessed.
* Probe: the examiner push the students to go beyong his or her abilities. This part can be scored or not.
* Wind down: relax the students with easy questions. This is not scored.
     


Classroom Speaking Assessment Techniques
                                                                         
Oral presentations: students talking about a familiar topic.
Debate on a controversial topic: a formal public speaking activity where two students or groups argue for or against a topic.
Reading aloud: it is a good pronunciation practice and assessment. Give students the chance to look at the passage first.
Retelling stories: give a report on the content of an article they read.
Verbal essays: students speak for three to five minutes on a specific prepared topic.
Extemporaneous speaking: students are given a topic to speak about it for two  minutes. They have no time in which to prepare.

                                                                       




Thursday, September 29, 2011

Assessing Listening

Summary
Chapter 5

As teachers we know that is important to assess listening skills, but sometimes we are unable to do this effectively. Nunan(2002) calls listening comprehension "the poor cousin amongst the various language skills."
Listening skill is not passive, it is an active process where students receive, construct meaning form, and respond to spoken messages.

Models of Listening
The two models are:
1. Bottom - up: comprehension occurs when the listener successfully decodes the spoken text. It also occurs when students take in a word, decode it and link it with other words to form sentences.
2. Top- down: the listener is directly involved with constructing meaning from input. The students uses background knowledge of the context and situation to make sense of what is heard.
                                                                              
Approaches to Listening Assessment
Buck(2001) identified three major approaches to the assessment of listening abilities: discrete point, integrative, and communicative approaches.

The discrete point broke listening into component elements and assessed them separately.

The integrative approach assess a learner's capacity to use mani bits at the same time. The whole of the language is greater than the sum of its parts.

The communicative approach. The listener must be able to comprehend the message and then use it in context. Communicative question formats should be authentic in nature.

Background Knowledge
Background or prior knowledge needs to be taken into account because research suggests that it affects comprehension and test performance. An attempt to standardize the presence or absence of backgroung knowledge should be made in any listening text that purports to be a valid indicator of comprehension.
 
                                                                                     
Techniques for Assessing Listening Comprehension       
1. Phonemic discrimination: students listen to one word in isolation and then tries to identify which word was said. Like in minimal pairs (ship/sheep).

2. Cloze: they listen to a passage while referring to a written transript of the text in which several words have been deleted. Students are asked to fill in the blanks while listening.

3. Dictation: it assess a wide range of skills, do it with short text that you will read three times.

4. Information transfer tasks: it requires students to transfer information they have heard to a chart or visual.
                                          
Important Aspects

1. Unknown vocabulary should never occur as the correct answer.
2. Good sources of authentic speech to assess listening are: radio, television, pre-recorded teaching materials, pod casts, internet, and teacher produced materials.
3. For structure purposes in any test start with an easy question. Also ordered the questions as they are heard in the passage.
4. The timing of a test will be determined by how many times the test - takers are permitted to hear each passage. Remember to give time for pre - reading.
5. The way a listening test is administered and delivered can impact the results.
6. Give credit for students know, don't deduct for spelling or grammar mistakes when your focus is on listening comprehension.
7. Give students a reason for listening.                    
                                  




Wednesday, September 28, 2011

ASSESSING WRITING

Summary
Chapter 4

How important is writing in your program?. Assessing writing skills are important because good writing ability is significant for higher education and employers.

Two major approaches to writing assessment are: indirect and direct.
Indirect measures of writing assessment assess correct usage in sentence level constructions, spelling and puctuation. It is more concerned with accuracy than communication.
Direct measures of writing assess a student's ability to communicate through the written mode based on the actual production of written texts. It requires the students to produce the content; give ideas and use appropriate vocabulary, grammatical conventions, and syntax. Direct writing assessment integrates all elements of writing.

According to Hyland(2003) to design a good writing assessment tests and tasks involves four basic elements:                                                              
1. Rubric: instructions
2. Prompt: the task
3. Expected response: what students will do with the task.
4. post-task evaluation: assessing the effectiveness of the writing task.
 Also Hyland stated that good writing tasks are likely to produce positive responses to the following questions:

* Did the prompt discriminate well among my students?
* Were the essays easy to read and evaluate?
* Were students able to write to their potential and show what they knew?

Techniques for Assessing Writing
The ESL/EFL literature addresses two types of writing : free writing and guided writing.
Free writing: requires students to read a  prompt that poses a situation and write a planned response based a combination of background knowledge and knowledge learned in the present.
Guided writing: this task requires teachers to be clear about what they expect students to do. It requires them to manipulate content that is provided in the prompt, usually in the form of a chart or diagram.

Authentic Writing Assessment

Student-Teacher conferences
You can learn more from your students by asking questions like:
* How did you select this topic?
* What do you feel are your strengths in writing?
* What did you do to generate content?

Self-Assessment
You can use dialogue jornals or learning logs. The first require students to make entries on different topics. On the other hand, learning logs document time students spend on various writing activities.

Peer Assessment
The major rationale for peer assessment is that when students learn to evaluate the work of their peers, they are extending their own learning opportunities.

Portfolio Based Assessment           
It examines multiple pieces of writing produced over time under different constraints rather than a single essay. A portfolio is a collection of student writing that shows the stages in the writing process, the growth of the writer's.

Writing Assessment Scales  
 We need to select the appropriate writing scale for a particular teaching context. The two main types for assessing student written proficiency are holistic and analytic.

Holistic Marking Scales
It is based on the marker's toatl impression of the essay as a whole. This marking is  termed as impressionistic, global, or integrative marking.

Analytical Marking Scales
"Raters provide assessment for each of a number of aspects of performance"(Hamp-Lyons, 1991). Scorers mark selected aspects of a piece of writing and assignpoint values to quantifiable criteria. Analytic scales are generally more effective with inexperienced teachers and more realiable for scales with a larger point range.

It is important to provide feedback to students so they can learn and make improvements to their writing. You can do so by handwritten comments or simple correction codes.
Sample Marking Codes for Writing 
sp= spelling
vt= verb tense
ww= wrong word
wv= wrong verb
?= I don't understand

Remember to give positive remarks and feedback, but be careful too much praise can make students complacent. Be sure to give them aspects to be improve or correct in the following tasks or tests.


      



Monday, September 26, 2011

Assessing Reading

Summary
Chapter 3
By Licda. Belinda Davis

Of course, it is difficult to assess an invisible skill. We cannot see what is going on students' minds when they read or listen, so we design assessment based on constructs or models of receptive skills that include a variety of subskills.

Some examples of reliable reading assessments are: 
1. Cover a range of reading skills.
2. Choose different text topics and types.
3. Help students distinguish between main ideas and supporting details.
4. Help students get the meaning of unfamiliar words.
5. Students should recognize the purposes and audiences of texts.
            

6. Remember grammar is an important part of reading comprehension.

Since we can only get an idea of how students process texts through techniques such as think- aloud. For classroom assessment we can focus on important skills that are divides in major and minor reading skills.

MAJOR READING SKILLS INCLUDE:
- reading quickly to skim for gist and scan for specific details.
- reading carefully for main ideas.
- drawing inferences from both stated and implied content.

MINOR READING SKILLS INCLUDE:
- understanding at the sentence level(vocabulary, syntax)
- identifying what pronouns refer to, recognizing discourse markers.
- understanding nonlinear texts(meaning of graph or charts).

Specifications
They are used to establish a clear link between the overall objectives and the design of a particular assessment instruments. Some typical features of specifications are:

1. Content: refers to the material that will be cover.
2. Conditions: the structure and the component parts. Timing should also be include and the circumstances of the questions and answers.
3. Grading Criteria: how the assessment instrument will be marked.

There are many sources of reading texts. Keep a file of authentic material form newspapers, magazines, brochures, instruction guides and any suitable source of real texts.
Avoid texts with controversial material: religion, abortion, or international disputes. Remember that texts should be culturally neutral as possible to avoid offense.
Reading comprehension questions should be in the same order as the material in the passage.                                                                                   

We need in terms of reading assessment to think about the skills, techniques and formats that our students will need for standardized tests. Analize publicly available material and then try writing practice tests.
Give your students the opportunity to think beyond what they see in print. Reading is an important skill to master in English.